- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:57:46 -0500 (EST)
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
At a recent deltav presentation I was giving, someone suggested that "version selector" was not a very good term, since a checked out version selector doesn't really select a version. I believe this is a very good point, and would like to consider selecting a less misleading term. My favorite would be "version controlled resource", which we could shorten to just "controlled resource" in contexts where it is unambiguous. We can then say that the VERSION-CONTROL request creates a version controlled resource at the request URL. It also then is very natural to refer to a checked-in version controlled resource and a checked-out version controlled resource. I'm going to make a pass through the document to see how this works out in practice, and then if this goes smoothly, I'd like to post it for general comment. Any objections? Cheers, Geoff
Received on Monday, 4 December 2000 12:58:28 UTC