- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:17:29 -0800
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Agreed. There doesn't seem to be any need for a new method. Cheers, -g On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:27:38AM +0000, Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com wrote: > > > CHECKIN to an activity. > > Tim Ellison > Java Technology Centre, MP146 > IBM UK Laboratory, Hursley Park, Winchester, UK. > tel: +44 (0)1962 819872 internal: 249872 MOBx: 270452 > > > "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com> on 2000-11-19 06:05:06 PM > > Please respond to "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com> > > To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > cc: > Subject: Atomic CHECKIN of all checkouts of an activity > > > > > > Greg has asked for the ability to tell the server that he wants > all checkouts against an activity to be checked in atomically. > > A natural way to marshall this would be to allow CHECKIN to be > applied to an activity (since activities cannot be versioned, > this is unambiguous). Or we could introduce a CHECKIN-ACTIVITY > method. > > Any preferences (or objections)? > > Cheers, > Geoff > > > -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 20 November 2000 19:17:15 UTC