Re: workspaces

• From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
• Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:45:41 +0000
• To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
• Message-ID: <8025699D.004BDD1C.00@d06mta07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>

    <tim>
    I believe that the spec would have to be updated to deal
    with multiple workspaces for a given resource.
    </tim>

  <Geoff>
  I agree, but I think that it is better to say that a resource
  is in at most one workspace,
  </Geoff>

Agreed.

  <Geoff>
  but that the workspace of a child does not have to be the
  workspace of its parent (such as when the child itself is
  a workspace,
  </Geoff>

I don't mind dropping this strict hierarchical containment notion (since I
don't rely on it :-).  Other people can raise their own objections.

  <Geoff>
  or when the child is a binding to a resource that is in another
  workspace.
  </Geoff>

So when I have two workspaces A and B both with bindings to a resource C,
in which workspace is C?

Tim

Received on Monday, 20 November 2000 09:00:55 UTC