- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 23:16:01 -0500 (EST)
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 10:38:49AM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote: > From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> > > Section 9.1.1 shows the use of a VERSION-CONTROL on an existing resource. > However, it responds with a 201 (Created). I'm thinking that it should be a > 200 (OK) or a 204 (No Content) since it is not creating the Request-URI. > > I agree. I'd prefer just the 200(OK). I'll make this change if nobody > objects. Are you interested in formalizing the response at all, to provide the relevant URIs? (I'm just so-so on it, but others might want the extra feature) I'm medium to strongly against adding info like the version history or initial version URL to the VERSION-CONTROL response. Many clients won't need this information, and clients that do need it will often need more than that, so they'll have to issue a PROPFIND or property report request anyway. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Saturday, 18 November 2000 23:16:39 UTC