- From: Dennis E. Hamilton <infonuovo@email.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:38:56 -0700
- To: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I would say that, so long as label support is optional, and they don't depend on any non-core mechanism, that the core is a good place to put them. Mostly I see it encouraging developers to notice them and consider their support rather than come up with substitutes at the core level that don't scale into advanced. It may be a small thing, and I recommend it anyhow. -- Dennis AIIM DMware Technical Coordinator AIIM DMware http://www.infonuovo.com/dmware ODMA Support http://www.infonuovo.com/odma ------------------ Dennis E. Hamilton InfoNuovo mailto:infonuovo@email.com tel. +1-206-779-9430 (gsm) fax. +1-425-793-0283 http://www.infonuovo.com -----Original Message----- From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Geoffrey M. Clemm Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 09:07 To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: deltav-10.2 now available <http://www.webdav.org/deltav/protocol/draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-10.2.doc > Changes since deltav-10: - Moved version selector DAV:predecessor-set property to core. (Boris) - Made label support optional. (Lisa) - Removed Workspace header (Geoff) - Added DAV:must-not-be-checked-out precondition for LABEL (John) - Only require Multi-Status if there was an error in a Depth operation (e.g. LABEL and SET-TARGET). (John) - Got rid of "parent workspace" for MKWORKSPACE (Tim/Geoff) - Added DAV:no-checkout argument to MERGE (Tim) - Fixed BASELINE-CONTROL so that baseline (not baseline history) is the argument (Tim). Outstanding Issues: - Should labels be moved back to core? Cheers, Geoff
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2000 16:35:11 UTC