- From: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:48:15 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFD8995C95.F04F1BFB-ON85256972.00564A96@raleigh.ibm.com>
Labels have a role separate from support from baselining. They're just a mechanism for distinguishing revisions that is controled by the client. Without labels, clients that want to get a consistent set of revisions will have to remember all the server-generated URLs and/or version names. Although possible, this is state that the server should generally be providing for clients so they don't have to persist this kind of information. Since many document management clients don't want or need baselining or configuration functionality, the document management versioning servers do not want to have to provide the infrastructure (i.e. labels) for it. Cheers, Geoff Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 14:38:26 -0700 From: "Henry K. Harbury" <hharbury@assetvalue.com> I agree with Jim - but I would also add that labels provide more than just a human readable name, they provide the ability to define a unique configuration of the resources in the repository. One often does not want to get everything from the repository, just the subset of resources in the configuration identified by a unique label. Baselines provide this type of functionality in advanced versioning and labels provide it in core. If labels are removed from core, how is this accomplished? -- Henry.
Received on Sunday, 8 October 2000 11:48:31 UTC