Re: Naive question

From: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI (Boris_Bokowski@oti.com)
Date: Thu, Sep 14 2000

  • Next message: by way of : "RE: draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-08 now available"

    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Message-ID: <OF46176324.A143B9C1-ON8525695A.004F67E0@ott.oti.com>
    From: "Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI" <Boris_Bokowski@oti.com>
    Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:43:48 -0400
    Subject: Re: Naive question
    
       PROPFIND doesn't
       return live properties of the version when accessed through the
       version selector.
    
    That's correct, you'd have to ask for the live properties of
    the version if they wanted the live properties of the version.
    <jra>
    But this doesn't seem right. If you get the contents and dead properties
    through the version selector, then why not the version's live properties?
    Why are we requiring clients to get the version URL for this special case?
    </jra>
    <bb>
    For clients, this is not a very special case. In particular, when 
    displaying a tree of versioned resources in a GUI, I am interested in 
    getting the value of the selected versions' DAV:version-name property 
    using PROPFIND Depth: infinity. If the live properties of versions were 
    not visible through a version selector, I would have to issue one 
    additional request per resource to get the version name. The same may 
    apply to other live properties of versions, such as DAV:checkin-date.
    BTW, I don't think that a GUI can use the version URL (DAV:target) for 
    displaying version identification.
    </bb>