RE: version control body

From: Clemm, Geoff (gclemm@rational.com)
Date: Wed, Sep 13 2000

Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Working resource locations"

Previous message: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM: "Re: Naive question"
Maybe in reply to: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com: "version control body"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B179A11E@SUS-MA1IT01>
From: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:49:05 -0400
Subject: RE: version control body

Fixed.

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:30 AM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: version control body

In protocol-08 10.1 VERSION-CONTROL marshaling: the first sentence should
read:
"If a request body is included, it MUST be a DAV:version-control XML
element." since it is unnecessary when creating a new history.

Tim

Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Working resource locations"
Previous message: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM: "Re: Naive question"
Maybe in reply to: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com: "version control body"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]