Next message: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI: "Re: postcondition for PUT"
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:06:13 -0700
From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <20000829210613.N22160@lyra.org>
Subject: Re: MERGE response body
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 11:42:26PM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
>...
> [ note the current draft does not include "?" in the merge-response
> child
> elements ]
>
> I was inclined to make the update-set and ignored-set elements required
> (they
> can have 0 elements because of the "*"), just to make life marginally easier
> for
> the parser. But if anyone cares, I can make them optional.
*shrug*
Personally, I'd rather not see them if they will be empty lists. But I'm not
fussed about it.
However: if they will remain required, then the example will need to be
updated. It doesn't have an ignored-set element.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/