Next message: Clemm, Geoff: "RE: MERGE response body"
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B10D9E3B@SUS-MA1IT01>
From: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3c.org
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:49:44 -0400
Subject: RE: conference call?
Next Monday is a US holiday, so let's have one on Sept. 11.
The only outstanding semantic issue I have is to discuss the
proposal to use a "Error-Type" response header,
to use with a 409 status to indicate which preconditions were violated.
This is currently being discussed on the new mailing list JimW set
up for this topic, so there may be no need to discuss this on Monday.
If we in fact have no other outstanding semantic issues, then I think we
should go to last call, as a way of giving implementors a go-ahead
signal. I believe Chris had some issues/questions, but if they can
be handled expeditiously, it currently seems reasonable to try for
last call by the end of September. This would allow us to discuss
the last-call comments/issues at the December IETF meeting.
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI [mailto:Boris_Bokowski@oti.com]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 1:48 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3c.org
Subject: conference call?
When is the next conference call / TeleConf ?
-Boris.