Message-Id: <200008030029.UAA15934@windsor.research.att.com> From: Fred Douglis <douglis@research.att.com> To: "Delta-V" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 20:29:38 -0400 Subject: a few nits on the I-D After today's WG meeting, I thought I'd mention a small number of things that caught my eye when reading draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-06. Apologies if any have already been caught or addressed. First, I was caught by the spelling of "descendent" -- I thought it was descendant. Miriam-Webster claims the former is an alternative spelling for the latter, but the latter is clearly preferred. Was this a conscious decision? 2.1, 2nd sentence: must -> MUST ? 2.2: give example of SET-TARGET? 2.3: hyphenate "client assigned"? Why are all the x.y.z headings followed by text w/o spacing? Typo or some odd IETF requirement? e.g., 3.1.1 3.2: define "dead properties" or cross ref? 3.4: mention that current time is relative to the server's locale. 4.1: "has no affect" -> "has no effect" (twice) I have a couple of other things to mention, and will do so in separate messages. Fred Douglis AT&T Labs -- Research Shannon Laboratory Room B137 180 Park Ave, Bldg 103 P.O. Box 971 Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971 +1 973-360-8775 (voice) +1 973-360-7011 (fax) douglis@research.att.com http://www.research.att.com/~douglis/