Next message: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI: "RE: Disappearing CHECKINs"
Message-ID: <65B141FB11CCD211825700A0C9D609BC01D4D79C@chef.lex.rational.com>
From: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:36:27 -0500
Subject: RE: Label method body
OK, changed it back to DAV:add and DAV:delete (:-).
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI [mailto:Tim_Ellison@oti.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 12:34 PM
To: Matt Bisson
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: RE: Label method body
You're right! Hey, you can make me look like a dope anytime (it isn't
difficult <g>)
I'm not sure where I got LABEL <DAV:remove> from, so ignore me.
Thanks Matt,
Tim
"Matt Bisson"
<mbisson@Rati To: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI"
<Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
onal.Com> cc:
Subject: RE: Label method body
20-03-00
11:02 AM
I may have misunderstood your email (so I am mailing you directly so I
don't
sound like a dope :)), but in version 3.1 of the delta-v spec under LABEL
(6.5), it says:
The body of the request contains an XML document with either a DAV:add or a
DAV:delete member.
It doesn't seem to say anything about the remove element containing a label
though...
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
[mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Ellison/OTT/OTI
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 10:19 AM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Label method body
The label method body introduces an element <DAV:remove> defined as
containing #PCDATA (i.e., the label). RFC2518 already contains a
<DAV:remove> that contains a <DAV:prop> (i.e., for removing properties).
We should change the element name so that we can merge DTDs unambiguously.
Tim