workspaces and configurations

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm (geoffrey.clemm@rational.com)
Date: Thu, Mar 16 2000

  • Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: workspaces and configurations"

    Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:09:00 -0500 (EST)
    Message-Id: <200003161309.IAA03188@tantalum.atria.com>
    From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Subject: workspaces and configurations
    
    
    One point I neglected to add to the minutes from this week's conference
    call was Henry's suggestion that if we were removing the "dynamic" behavior
    from workspaces, why not unify the concept of workspaces and configurations?
    
    After some reflection, it appears to me that it makes good sense to
    model the new "stable" workspace object as simply a checked-out
    configuration, i.e. a "working configuration".  This not only unifies
    the concept of workspaces and configurations, but also unifies the
    notion of baselines and configurations (a baseline is the "checked in
    state of a workspace", and in this simplified model, all checked-in
    configurations will by definition always be the checked in state of a
    workspace).
    
    Unless there are objections, I will include this unification in the
    "stable workspace" proposal I'm working up.
    
    Cheers,
    Geoff