Next message: Tim Ellison OTT: "RE: revision versus version"
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000303075548.02cd6830@127.0.0.1>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 07:55:48 -0500
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Edgar Schwarz <Edgar.Schwarz@marconicomms.com> (by way of "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>)
Subject: revision versus version
[caught in spam filter -rrs]
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 02:27:01 -0500 (EST)
X-Envelope-From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@tux.w3.org Fri Mar 3 02:27:00 2000
Message-ID: <38BF691C.27586DE3@marconicomms.com>
Old-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 08:26:20 +0100
From: Edgar Schwarz <Edgar.Schwarz@marconicomms.com>
Organization: Marconi Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.6 sun4u)
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
Subject: [Moderator Action] revision versus version
Clemm, Geoff wrote:
>
> Usual time and number:
> 2-3PM EST, 888-819-8909 pass-code 97985
>
> Current Agenda Items:
>
> - DAV:default-revision vs. DAV:default-label vs. neither
This reminds me of a silly question I have for a while, being no native
English speaker.
Why is is it that DAVersioning concerns revisions instead of versions.
Does 'version' have a meaning which is incompatible with versioning ?
Regards, Edgar
--
mailto:Edgar.Schwarz@marconicomms.com, Postfach 1920, D-71509 Backnang
Marconi Communications, Access Networks Development, Software Engineering
Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler (Albert Einstein)