Re: Localized baselines

From: Eric Sedlar (esedlar@us.oracle.com)
Date: Sun, Feb 27 2000

Next message: David.Goodenough@dga.co.uk: "Collection Fetch/Save proposal"

Previous message: Clemm, Geoff: "RE: Localized baselines"
In reply to: Clemm, Geoff: "RE: Localized baselines"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Message-ID: <006101bf8154$6076fd30$9a114498@us.oracle.com>
From: "Eric Sedlar" <esedlar@us.oracle.com>
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 10:56:37 -0800
Subject: Re: Localized baselines

The advantage of baselines is performance--each collection instance has a
pointer to the correct REVISION of the children, rather than the versioned
resource, saving a level of indirection on disk.  It seems to me that high
scalability will require the use of baselines.  Why not use them?

--Eric

Next message: David.Goodenough@dga.co.uk: "Collection Fetch/Save proposal"
Previous message: Clemm, Geoff: "RE: Localized baselines"
In reply to: Clemm, Geoff: "RE: Localized baselines"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]