Next message: jamsden@us.ibm.com: "Re: DAV:revision-resourcetype"
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 23:26:39 -0500
Message-Id: <10001280426.AA29857@tantalum>
From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: DAV:revision-resourcetype
From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
Could you give it some more meaningful name like revision-storageformat?
DAV:revision-resourcetype is too similar to DAV:resourcetype but is playing
a much different role.
I'm very mellow about what we call this property.
For that matter, I'm pretty mellow about whether we put in the spec at
all ... all CM servers I know will have one, but heck, we can just
each make up our own names for it (:-).
I will note though that the appropriate storage format is closely
tied (and sometimes identical) to the resourcetype.
Cheers,
Geoff