Next message: jamsden@us.ibm.com: "Re: DAV:revision-resourcetype"
From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com (Tim Ellison OTT)
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning)
Message-ID: <2000Jan27.104846.1250.1459099@otismtp.ott.oti.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:48:58 -0500
Subject: Re: DAV:revision-resourcetype
>That's a good point. DAV:resourcetype is defined to be "ANY"
>and the only value for it defined in rfc2518 is DAV:collection.
>
>Is any server actually storing mime types in the DAV:resourcetype
>property? Is there any reason not to do so?
I don't see any reason why not, although I wouldn't expect it to be set in
the content-type header in a GET response -- to retain compatible behaviour
with non-dav servers.
Tim