RE: More recent version of the draft?

From: Tim Ellison OTT (Tim_Ellison@oti.com)
Date: Fri, Jan 07 2000

  • Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: More recent version of the draft?"

    From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com (Tim Ellison OTT)
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning), Neil.Weber@merant.com (Neil Weber)
    Message-ID: <2000Jan07.111044.1250.1435817@otismtp.ott.oti.com>
    Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:11:50 -0500
    Subject: RE: More recent version of the draft?
    
    
    I've probaby added to the confusion by trying to second-guess the protocol 
    doc based on discussions at the Washington IETF meeting and on the mailing 
    list.
    
    The scenarios doc includes a VERSION method since that was tentatively 
    agreed upon at the time.
    
    I will update the scenarios (and broadcast the fact) as soon as I get the 
    new protocol.
    
    Tim
     ----------
    >From: Neil Weber
    >To: ietf-dav-versioning
    >Subject: More recent version of the draft?
    >Date: Friday, January 07, 2000 7:53AM
    >
    >[released from the jaws of the spam filter -ralph]
    >
    >The draft version of the DeltaV spec available from
    >http://dav.ics.uci.edu/vdt/ is quite old.  It doesn't even cover the 
    VERSION
    >method.  Is there another location I can find a more up to date draft?
    >
    >Thanks,
    >Neil Weber
    >Neil.Weber@Merant.com
    >
    >