Re: Check-in policy
Tim Ellison OTT (Tim_Ellison@oti.com)
Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:32:04 -0500
From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com (Tim Ellison OTT)
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning)
Message-ID: <1999Nov16.112800.1250.1386448@otismtp.ott.oti.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:32:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Check-in policy
I don't object.
Tim
----------
>From: Geoffrey M. Clemm
>To: ietf-dav-versioning
>Subject: Re: Check-in policy
>Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 11:17AM
>
>Although I originally proposed the addition of the "-if-identical"
>checkin policies, I'd like to retract that proposal. In particular,
>I believe that the difficulty of saying "what it means to be identical"
>(the issue raised by Tim) will result in these policies being useless
>for interoperability, and that the best thing is for the client to do
>the compare itself (using lower level primitives).
>
>So if nobody objects, I'd like to remove these two checkin policies from
>the protocol.
>
>Cheers,
>Geoff
>
>