- From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:58:32 -0800
- To: Uma Umamaheswaran <umavs@ca.ibm.com>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
[[ With my charset reviewer hat on ]] At 4:58 PM -0500 1/16/04, Uma Umamaheswaran wrote: >The following is a RE-POSTING of a previous request to ietf-charsets.org -- >that got nowhere in its disposition. It *did* get somewhere: it got heavily discussed. The gist of the discussion was that the request was both unnecessary and possibly harmful to the established base of software because that base would need to be updated with the new aliases. > I am re-submitting this to the list. >The original was posted on 29 July 2002. Can you summarize what the difference in the situation is between now and 17 months ago? Are there more or fewer implementations that require a hyphen in order to work? If there are more, what caused them to require the hyphen in the name? >Please advise how to proceed with this request. Starting this discussion is the right way to proceed, but bringing us up to date on what has changed would be even better. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 18:59:38 UTC