Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:35:08PM -0800, Markus Scherer wrote:
> Simon Butcher wrote:
> >Just a quick question: Why don't the entries for ISO-10646-UCS-2 and 
> >ISO-10646-UCS-4 their abbreviated aliases, UCS-2 and UCS-4 respectively?
> 
> Missing verb like "refer to"?
> 
> Anyway, you can use the UTF-* names instead of the above.

that would not refer to the ISO standard, but to Unicode in stead.
There are subtle differences in doing that.

Best regards
keld

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2003 20:31:40 UTC