- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:26:59 -0500
- To: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
At 11:03 03/01/13 -0500, Francois Yergeau wrote: >Martin Duerst wrote: > > Just to be sure: Is a 4-byte sequence that encodes a codepoint > > beyond 10FFFF legal in your new version of the draft or not? > >Good question, I had not thought about it. Thinking about it now, my take >is that the essence of the proposal is to restrict UTF-8 to the >UTF-16-accessible range, which means 0-10FFFF. Anything beyond that would >be out of bounds. I think that makes a lot of sense. Regards, Martin. >Note that my "new version of the draft" doesn't exist yet, I just floated a >proposal that I think makes sense. Probably I should produce a new draft >ASAP to have something concrete to discuss and to root out any devilish >details, such as the above. > >-- >Fran輟is
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 16:14:59 UTC