RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)

Martin Duerst wrote:
> I think I would advocate that we update stringprep/nameprep/idna
> immediately to Unicode 4.0 if it were not for the fact that
> this technology is just now being introduced.

You need not bundle stringprep/nameprep/idna all in one big lump.  I think
stringprep could very well (and should, IMHO) be updated right now, so that
new profiles can use all of 4.0.  But I agree that IDNA should not bite the
bullet too hastily.

-- 
François

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:01:50 UTC