- From: Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 21:16:27 -0700
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Mark Davis <mark.davis@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: iana@iana.org, ietf-charsets@iana.org
Gakk. What a mess. Is anything in progress to fix it? Mark __________ http://www.macchiato.com ◄ “Eppur si muove” ► ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org> To: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@us.ibm.com> Cc: <iana@iana.org>; <ietf-charsets@iana.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 17:50 Subject: KS_C_5601 (was: Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)) > Hello Mark, > > There is an archive of this list at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-charsets/ > > with search. Please have a look at it, e.g. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-charsets/2001AprJun/0033.html . > > Regards, Martin. > > At 16:02 02/07/02 -0700, Mark Davis wrote: > > >We had a question come up that I'm hoping to get some feedback on. In the > >registry, there are two cases where the same code page is given with > >different years. See below. Anytime two names are aliases, they have to > >point to precisely the same mapping. Now, I can believe that > >ANSI_X3.4-1968 is identical with ANSI_X3.4-1986, but it seems surprising > >that KS_C_5601-1987 is identical with KS_C_5601-1989. Can anyone confirm > >that these are in fact identical? > > > >Mark > > > >-------------------------------- > > >Name: KS_C_5601-1987 [RFC1345,KXS2] > >MIBenum: 36 > >Source: ECMA registry > >Alias: iso-ir-149 > >Alias: KS_C_5601-1989 > >Alias: KSC_5601 > >Alias: korean > >Alias: csKSC56011987 > > > > > >Mark > >___ > >mark.davis@us.ibm.com > >IBM, MS 50-2/B11, 5600 Cottle Rd, SJ CA 95193 > >(408) 256-3148 > >fax: (408) 256-0799 > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 00:42:13 UTC