- From: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:26:53 -0400
- To: ietf-charsets@iana.org
David Hopwood écrit : > I suggest: > > [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard", > Versions 2.0 and > later. <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/>. > > [UNICODE-3-2] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, > Version 3.2", > defined by [UNICODE-3-0] as amended by [UAX27] and [UAX28]. > <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/enumeratedve > rsions.html > #Unicode_3_2_0>. > > [UNICODE-3-0] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, > Version 3.0", > Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5. > > [UAX27] The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Standard Annex #27: > Unicode 3.1", > May 2001. <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27>. > > [UAX28] The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Standard Annex #28: > Unicode 3.2", > March 2002. <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28>. Why is that b etter than what we currently have? -- François
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 15:28:08 UTC