Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt

On 17/04/2002 10:40:23 Martin Duerst wrote:
[...]

> <33>
>     In general, the changes amount to adding new characters, which does
>     not pose particular problems with old data.  Amendment 5 to ISO/IEC
>     10646, however, has moved and expanded the Korean Hangul block,
>
> As far as I understand, amendments for ISO standards are numbered
> separately for each version. So we need to clearly say here that
> it is Amendments 5 to 10646:1993. Also, saying when that change
> happened (Ken?) will help bringing things in perspective for the
> new reader.

A minor point.  In:

>     Amendment 5 to ISO/IEC
>     10646, however, has moved and expanded the Korean Hangul block,

the "has" makes it sound recent.  Please drop it.

Thanks,
Misha

[...]




------------------------------------------------------------- ---
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 08:15:40 UTC