RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard

At 20:59 02/04/09 +0200, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B‹N(B wrote:
>--On 2002-04-08 14.26 -0400 Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes.
>
>Good. I am happy you are interested in doing this work.
>
>I have a couple of other people which told me they could help aswell. I
>presume you are ok with taking the token here.
>
>Martin D$B—F(Brst and myself talked over the phone the other day, and he let me
>know he had a list of things he would like to have changed in the document,
>so a new I-D seems to be needed.

Here is the list of the main things that I think should be done:

- Say something about the BOM (probably something along the lines:
   this exists, but is not recommended)

- Remove some historical stuff, move the rest of it to a separate
   section (in the back rather than in the front).

- Check/update terminology with respect to UCS-2/UTF-16,...

- Check/update references

Any comments? Any other main points?

If I have time (e.g. over the weekend), I will mark up the current
text in xml2rfc and start editing.

Regards,    Martin.

Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 02:36:11 UTC