Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32 from Martin Duerst on 2001-05-26 (ietf-charsets@w3.org from April to June 2001)

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:52:17 +0900
To: (wrong string) 輯(Bn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: (wrong string) 輯(Bn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>, ietf-charsets@iana.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <4.2.0.58.J.20010526095040.05f15ae0@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

At 19:15 01/05/20 +0200, Keld J$B輯(Bn Simonsen wrote:
>You really should not do this. UCS-4 is the canonical representation of
>10646. UTF-32 would be misleading, as the UCS-4 is not a transformation 
>format,
>but the "real thing".

Which one? Little endian? Big endian? Or some cris-cross version?

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 20:58:59 UTC