- From: McDonald, Ira <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:47:56 -0800
- To: "'Martin J. Duerst'" <duerst@w3.org>, Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com>, charsets@innosoft.com
Hi Markus and Martin, I just visited the Unicode Consortium home page and verified my memory - UTF#6 (SCSU) has the status 'Approved' (by Unicode Consortium) but is NOT incorporated into the brand new Unicode v3.0 specification. I *think* that weakens the case for IANA registration, but I could easily be wrong. Harald or Ned - what do you guys think? Cheers, - Ira McDonald, consulting architect at Sharp Labs America High North Inc -----Original Message----- From: Martin J. Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 3:23 PM To: Markus Scherer; charsets@innosoft.com Subject: Re: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA This is probably a difficult one. - We don't really want it to be used too much, but the IANA policy for registrations (as far as I have heard from people I consider relevant in this respect) currently tends towards 'register if somebody uses it, even if we think it shouldn't be used'. - Strictly formally speaking, the thing fits the definition for 'charset', but it's really rather far away from the average case. So I would say: Register, but with as big a warning as possible. Regards, Martin. At 00/03/20 10:49 -0800, Markus Scherer wrote: >Hello, > >I just subscribed to this list a few days ago and did not see any traffic >that would have shown me the table manners. >My job is with IBM in a team that produces Unicode- and I18N-related >libraries for Java and C/C++. > >Proposal: I would like to register an encoding as follows with the IANA >list at >http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets : > > >Name: SCSU >MIBenum: 107 ?? >Source: A Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode, Unicode Technical >Report #6, http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr6/ >Alias: [none] > > >This is a character encoding scheme for Unicode. Algorithmic >transformation of Unicode text to and from SCSU is fairly >simple and can yield a similar code point:byte count ratio as legacy >encodings. It is stateful. US-ASCII and ISO-8859-1 text >that does not contain control codes other than NUL, TAB, CR, LF is also >correct SCSU text. SCSU uses all byte values. > > >I am looking forward to get feedback from you and hope to advance this >towards a registration. > > >Thanks, > >markus
Received on Monday, 20 March 2000 22:50:38 UTC