- From: Francois Yergeau <yergeau@alis.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 16:16:07 -0500
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
À 21:40 03/02/99 +0900, Martin J. Duerst a écrit : >If something is tagged "UTF-16BE" or "UTF-16LE", then it's not "UTF-16", It certainly is *encoded* in UTF-16, even though it is not *tagged* with the string "UTF-16". >and the XML specification doesn't speak about that. The XML spec says that entities *encoded* in UTF-16 must have a BOM. However tagged internally or externally. Putting a "UTF-16BE" tag on an XML entity doesn't make the requirement go away. -- François
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 1999 19:15:37 UTC