- From: Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 07:56:57 -0700
- To: Unicore <unicore@unicode.org>, ietf charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
>Ken Whistler wrote: > >> With regards to Harald Alvestrand's summary of the open >> issues with respect to the UTF-16 registration, the only >> way I see forward, given the nature of the "charset" >> definition, is to split this request into two registrations: >> >> UTF-16 big-endian UTF-16 >> UTF-16BS little-endian (byte-swapped) UTF-16 How about UTF-16BE big-endian UTF-16 UTF-16LE little-endian UTF-16 and, for those occasions where the byte order can vary, UTF-16BM UTF-16 beginning with a byte order mark - Dan --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Saturday, 25 July 1998 07:59:16 UTC