Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Addressed to: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@INNOSOFT.COM>
              ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM

** Reply to note from Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@INNOSOFT.COM> Mon, 03 Mar 1997 09:52:38 -0800 (PST) 
 
 
> > I agree.  Let's either restrict access to the list, or shut it down.  
>   
> As I have pointed out before, this isn't possible. This is an IETF list  
> intended for discussion of character set issues -- a highly political area to  
> begin with. IETF discussions are supposed to be open to all comers, including  
> people not subscribed to the list. I am not going to open myself up to a charge  
> that I've unfairly restricted IETF discussions. Simply put, I don't want to be  
> sued. 
 
   To me it does not make any sense sending a mail to a list which I'm 
not subscribed to, since I would not be able to see any responses. So 
why? If it is for adminstrative messages on the standards process 
from some general IETF staff, this could be forwarded by the WG 
convenor, couldn't it?  
 
Yours,  
 


Lko Willms  
Frankfurt/Main  
===== Lueko.Willms@T-Online.de ===== L.Willms@link-f.rhein-main.de ===== 
   PGP-Schluessel anfordern: Nachricht an mich mit GET PGP KEY im Betreff 
   Ask for the public key: message with GET PGP KEY in the subject  
Gedanken zum Tage: 
  
Der Mann hatte soviel Verstand, dass er zu fast nichts mehr in der Welt zu
gebrauchen war. -G.C.Lichtenberg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: cp850
Comment: Protect your privacy with PGP

iQCVAwUBMyo/JlUB0+mjnrrxAQFQhAP/fr1LmIYIp0RI2NimhOpBriWrSjto+B/d
sfgWMuENFB59HW2Os03xuUqJYA1ApnYQtJroX3v5r3p+QQe8JI0I2fIXRq4GDdsr
AQwMkGg70XeSZDfIkSOMroUFM1kkthI9eoWwyuFMCmD50gbnXOn+1epyprhPwzct
WoVT6SwX/vg=
=buYp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)

Received on Friday, 14 March 1997 22:35:03 UTC