- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 1994 23:28:52 +0900 (JST)
- To: asmusf@microsoft.com (Asmus Freytag)
- Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, David_Goldsmith@taligent.com, unicored@Unicode.ORG
I already explained why UTF-7 can't be a meaningful experiment. So, I won't repeat it. I have some commnet on psuedo discussions between braindead people. > | >ISO 8859-1 as their standard (and ISO 8859-1 is the defacto standard today) In my entire carrier, I have seen various encoding methods including EBCDIC. Still, I have never seen 8859/1 being used, though it may be a defacto standard in small region of Europe. > Flat 16-bits remains the long term > preferred target encoding for ALL application domains. No. It may be a not-so-preferred target in a little larger region of Europe. That's all. Masataka Ohta --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Monday, 6 June 1994 07:34:59 UTC