- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1996 18:59:35 -0500
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: http-caching@pa.dec.com (http-caching mailing list)
In message <9601022339.AA28736@acetes.pa.dec.com>, Jeffrey Mogul writes: >However, one of the concepts that came out of the AFS work (I >believe), called "volume validation", seems like it might go >a long way to improving cache performance for large proxies, >and yet could be implemented without much hassle (I think). > >Here's a first cut at a design; please don't hold me to the details, >but I would be interested in comments. Cool idea. > Volume-ID: <opaque string> > Volume-version: <opaque-string> > Volume-expiration: <date> (or maybe <offset in seconds>?) I could handle a less verbose syntax: Volume: <id> <version> <date-in-YYYYMMDDHHMMSSZ-format> Date parsing: Just Say No! Dan
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 1996 00:22:56 UTC