- From: Cynthia Clark <cclark@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 13:47:46 -0500
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Cc: mogul@pa.dec.com, http-caching@pa.dec.com, internet-drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, cclark@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Larry, Since I'm not sure if you mean changing from "draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt" OR "draft-mogul-http-caching-00.txt" to "draft-ietf-http-range-retrieval-00.txt" ??? Please be more specific with the filename, thanks. Later, Cynthia ----- Forwarded Message ------ To: mogul@pa.dec.com CC: http-caching@pa.dec.com, internet-drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US In-reply-to: Jeffrey Mogul's message of Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:08:10 -0800 <9602210108.AA10525@acetes.pa.dec.com> Subject: Re: Revised "Range:" proposal From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> Fake-Sender: masinter@parc.xerox.com Message-Id: <96Feb20.193227pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 19:32:19 PST Since the byte range draft is now a 'committee' work, I suggest you name this draft-ietf-http-range--retrieval-00.txt and add a header that says that "A subgroup of the HTTP working group has developed this after several rounds of discussion. Some but not all parts of this proposal are currently implemented in commercial web servers and browsers."
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 1996 19:14:20 UTC