- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:38:51 -0700
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: http-caching@pa.dec.com
> I do like Koen's suggestion that only 200 and 206 responses are > cachable with an explicit expiration time (Expires: or max-age:); > it simplifies part of the caching design that I hadn't gotten around > to writing (because I wasn't sure how to deal with it). Here's what > I plan to include: Nope -- cachable if marked as such. If Cache-control: public is given without any max-age or expires, that means for as long as the cache likes. .......Roy
Received on Friday, 19 April 1996 01:27:13 UTC