- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 06:59:28 PDT
- To: fielding@avron.ics.uci.edu, koen@win.tue.nl, mogul@pa.dec.com, http-caching@pa.dec.com
> must-revalidate is just a max-age=0 with a special warning attached. > If you want to trade must-revalidate for a Warning: header code with > the same semantics, I have no big problem. It seems that max-age=0 with a special warning attached is more general, if not more useful, than must-revalidate. So what's the "special warning"? Is there some risk that the warning would get ignored when 'must-revalidate' would not?
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 1996 14:26:39 UTC