- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:33:46 PST
- To: http-caching@pa.dec.com
The primary goal of the http-caching subgroup is to review those elements of Roy's HTTP/1.1 proposal that affect caching proxy servers. Primarily you want to make sure that the kind of caching proxy servers in use today (e.g., proxy caches for companies, firewalls, hierarchical national caches) are supported. Secondarily, you want to not make some of the more experimental caching schemes (using multicast, netnews, prospective retrieval) impossible. On the other hand, the HTTP caching group need not actually design or promote a particular kind of caching and proxying, or to find ways of performing caching or proxying that is more effective than what we have currently deployed. Give us the language, don't write the novels. I think in particular that you must leave open the possibility that servers will want to do content negotiation using factors that cannot be easily downloaded to the proxy or client (since that's what we have now). I don't think you need to or should design a system for explicit revocation. Roy made some explicit proposals in his HTTP/1.1 specification. I hope that the subgroup starts out reviewing them, with regard to their adequacy or lack thereof for caching.
Received on Friday, 29 December 1995 21:48:02 UTC