- From: Aron Bergman <bathingrad@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 18:13:29 +0200
- To: Jim Derry <balthisar@gmail.com>
- Cc: Internet LifeHacks <nathashakck@gmail.com>, html-tidy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALdbZh8PL+r9GB21+LR6iADrLemaXrWGdOmcu0ToA9eai3mYaw@mail.gmail.com>
Oh, I forgot that the mails are archived and thus indexable. That explains why they add the URL... Thanks for clearing that up for me :) Vänliga hälsningar Best regards Aron Bergman bathingrad@gmail.com +46 70-325 00 89 Bäling 150 820 77 Gnarp 2018-04-16 16:13 GMT+02:00 Jim Derry <balthisar@gmail.com>: > These are just spammers trying to get their crappy websites indexed. > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Aron Bergman <bathingrad@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2018-04-02 18:05 GMT+02:00 Internet LifeHacks <nathashakck@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> When i am coding with HTML, When a button is required based on my mood i >>> choose between <input type="button" /> or <button></button> . I am yet to >>> find a reason to not use of one to another or at least a best practice of >>> using which one. So I would like to know from you all , which one you are >>> using and why ? >>> >>> Also if possible please anyone explain what situation to use which one >>> of these and whether there is a possible performance hit dependencies and >>> all. >>> >>> Thanks & Regards >>> Nathasha >>> http://bestfragranceformen.com >>> >> >> Hi, >> I don't think that this mailing list is supposed to answer questions >> about HTML in general, Google is your friend regarding these kinds of >> questions. >> Searching for html type=button vs button >> <https://www.google.com/search?q=html+type%3Dbutton+vs+button> returned this >> StackOverflow answer >> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25436145/input-type-button-vs-button> >> . >> >> Regards >> Aron >> > > > > -- > --- > Jim Derry > Clinton Township, MI, USA > Nanjing, Jiangsu, China PRC >
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 16:13:53 UTC