- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:59:25 -0500
- To: Terry Teague <terry_teague@users.sourceforge.net>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org, tidy-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
A great many were duplicates. And many more had been closed previously, but the SF Tracker has an annoying tendency to re-open any ticket you even look at while logged in. So, please be careful to only re-open those that you mean to and/or that there isn't a duplicate entry. The outstanding queue is still very large. So, if the need is urgent, your best bet - as always - is to implement the change yourself and submit a patch. I also picked some of the low hanging fruit off the bug list. Basically, I was doing a review to see what are the critical issues before going "live" with TidyLib. I didn't see any show stoppers, but I might be biased. As far as new development goes, I believe we have consensus that the next major effort is proper internal transcoding to/from Unicode/10646. But I think this should wait until after we switch over. take it easy, Charlie At 09:18 PM 12/21/2002 -0800, Terry Teague wrote: >Dear Folks, > >Charlie recently reviewed a bunch of the outstanding Feature Requests for >Tidy, and set many of them to "Pending" meaning the request has either >been addressed, or rejected. Some were set to "Pending" without further >comment. > >So if you weren't already notified automatically of a change in status of >your favorite Tidy Feature Request, maybe because you entered the Feature >Request anonymously, it might behoove you to visit the Feature Requests >tracker, as "Pending" items get automatically closed after 15 days, and >they fall off the radar. > >Visit <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=27659> for more information. > >Regards, Terry
Received on Sunday, 22 December 2002 11:54:40 UTC