- From: Bill Burton <billb@progress.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:02:34 -0500
- To: html-tidy@w3.org
Hello, Charles Reitzel wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Good idea. But it seems doable by the app or a simple helper function. > If you write a tld parser function, can you post it? We could put it > in the contrib section on Source Forge. Yes, that makes sense. Maybe it could be included in jTidy but if not, it would probably be easiest to write a wrapper for that. Sorry, I have no plans to add .tld support. The idea just occurred to me having seen several posts for people needing support for their JSP taglibs. -Bill > take it easy, > Charlie > > At 11:50 AM 11/25/2002 -0500, Bill Burton wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> A nice enhancement for formatting JSP's would be for Tidy/jTidy to >> automatically add support for whatever tags are declared in the .tld >> (tag descriptor library) file(s). There would need to be a new option >> to allow specifying the path to the web.xml so it could derive the >> path to the .tld's or jar file(s) containing .tld's. >> >> -Bill >> >> Charles Reitzel wrote: >> >>> You can tell Tidy about new block, empty, inline and preformatted >>> tags. See (respectively): >>> http://tidy.sourceforge.net/docs/quickref.html#new-blocklevel-tags >>> http://tidy.sourceforge.net/docs/quickref.html#new-empty-tags >>> http://tidy.sourceforge.net/docs/quickref.html#new-inline-tags >>> http://tidy.sourceforge.net/docs/quickref.html#new-pre-tags >>> take it easy, >>> Charlie >>> >>> At 10:18 AM 11/25/2002 +0000, Julian Voelcker wrote: >>> >>>> I have a CMS app that stores chunks of HTML into a database, however >>>> am noticing that the code provided by the editor isn't that clean >>>> and would like to use Tidy to clean it up. >>>> >>>> The only problem is that we have added some of our own custom tags >>>> to the html. >>>> >>>> Is there any way to provide Tidy with an exceptions list of tags to >>>> ignore? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Julian Voelcker >>>> The Virtual World (UK) Limited >>>> Cirencester, United Kingdom >>> >> >
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 13:02:37 UTC