- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 05:20:28 +0200
- To: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
* Charles Reitzel wrote: >> > The "o:p" stand for the p tag inside the o namespace. Is a namespace by >> > that name defined anywhere in the file? You can recognize it by the xmlns >> > prefix. >> > Most probably it's a left over from a faulty XSL transformation. >> > Without seeing the file it's a bit difficult to tell you why Tidy does not >> > mark all of them as errors. Probably it's the order of the tags that makes >> > them faulty or not. ex. <o:p> inside <body> can be excepted, but outside >> > <body> not. >Word2000 will use the o: namespace prefix (o for Office). Using >--word-2000 yes should also fix the problem. This option will also clean >up a bunch of the cruft Office puts in HTML files. Often used with --clean >and --bare. Hmm. % tidylib --word-2000 yes <o:p>...</o:p> line 1 column 1 - Warning: <o:p> is not approved by W3C line 1 column 1 - Warning: inserting missing 'title' element ^Z Info: Document content looks like HTML proprietary 2 warnings, 0 errors were found! <html> <head> <meta content= "HTML Tidy for Windows (vers 1st October 2002), see www.w3.org" name="generator"> <title></title> </head> <body> <o:p>...</o:p> </body> </html> Is this really intended? Does it need a proper xmlns:o to work? Or am I encountering a bug? Without --word-2000 I get line 1 column 1 - Error: <o:p> is not recognized! line 1 column 1 - Warning: discarding unexpected <o:p> line 1 column 1 - Warning: plain text isn't allowed in <head> elements line 1 column 1 - Warning: inserting missing 'title' element line 1 column 9 - Warning: discarding unexpected </o:p> That's even worse. And another one, using --word-2000 I also get Info: Doctype given is "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN" Info: Document content looks like HTML 3.2 Neither is true; the first reminds me to a bug I really thought I had fixed and my May 2002 standalone build does not tell me about any given document type declaration; Did you miss that bug fix when building the library code? regards.
Received on Sunday, 13 October 2002 23:19:53 UTC