- From: Bill Pringlemeir <spam_account@sympatico.ca>
- Date: 08 Oct 2002 11:44:47 -0400
- To: Achim Schaefer <Achim.Schaefer@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
On Monday 07 October 2002 21:04, Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > These links list files as "tgz" with a size of 150k. > > "http://tidy.sourceforge.net/src/tidy_src.tgz" > "http://tidy.sourceforge.net/src/old/" > > Gzip kept complaining of a bad header, so I looked at the files with > Emacs in hexl-mode and they are straight tar file. Terry> What platform are you running on? I know there are some Terry> problems with the binary executable tar files on some Terry> platforms, but I believe is the first problem I have heard of Terry> about the source archive. I am running with Mingw compiled tools on x86-win32 platform. I built the tools myself with gcc 2.95.2. >tar --version GNU tar version 1.11.2 >gzip --version gzip 1.2.4 (18 Aug 93) Compilation options: NO_DIR SYS_UTIME STDC_HEADERS NO_CHOWN PROTO However, they do work fine. I use them with several emacs packages and never had any problems with them before. Achim> Maybe, you have used netscape for downloading these files? Achim> I'm not sure wether that's your problem, but I know that in Achim> some cases netscape decompresses files when downloading them. I did a wget from my linux machine and used curl on the same machine. You are correct. Netscape 6.2.3 surprised me. Sorry to interrupt the html-tidy mailing continuum with crude. Recent trojans to OpenSSH, etc have made me paranoid. Netscape 6.2.3 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 This is indeed my problem. Any reason for "tgz" instead of ".tar.gz". I guess that some poor deficient OS's cann't handle them. Netscapes behavior is surprising. It would probably be good to decrypt before viewing, but not really great while saving with the same extension. Thanks, Bill Pringlemeir
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 12:00:12 UTC