- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:16:54 -0400
- To: "Howard, Kipp (LNG-CL)" <Kipp.Howard@lexisnexis.com>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org, Björn Höhrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 13:11:52 UTC
Of course, you are right. I am just used to Tidy's output, I guess. Thanks, I now have a patch that does the trick. <?xml version="1.0"?> <root> <empty /> <empty /> </root> It appears to work fine on all of our existing XML test cases. I have attached them in a zip file so folks can look them over. I'd like to get some feedback (Björn?) to see if this is what is wanted everywhere. take it easy, Charlie At 09:06 AM 7/11/2002 -0700, Howard, Kipp (LNG-CL) wrote: > > Anyway, I do _not_ get the extra newlines with current > > production Tidy (1st July). > >But I believe you are: > >Hopefully the original input was: > ><?xml version="1.0"?> ><root> > <empty/> > <empty></empty> ></root> > > > HTML Tidy for Windows (vers 1st July 2002; built on Jul 11 > > 2002, at 11:41:09) > > Parsing "junk.xml" > > No warnings or errors were found. > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <root> > > <empty /> > > > > <empty> > > </empty> > > </root> > >And now your are getting the above <empty> element with a newline when it >should have been: > <empty></empty> >or even > <empty/> >either would be fine but for some reason we are getting > <empty> > </empty>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 13:11:52 UTC