- From: Terry Teague <teague@mailandnews.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 23:36:34 -0700
- To: Steve Hahn <hahn@fnal.gov>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
Dear Steve, > My name is Steve Hahn. I'm a physicist on a large collider experiment >(CDF) >at Fermilab. We've taken to using web pages for more and more uses, and I >only >recently found your Tidy applications for the Mac. First off, thanks! These >are great! I went the W3C pages to look up an obscure HTML question, only to >find that now the spec is XHTML 1.0 not HTML 1.0 or 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever I >thought it was. And tools are even provided to get one up to speed. > So, now to the bugs. I don't know if these are the BBedit's >implementation's >fault, or Tidy itself (or perhaps my misunderstanding of the spec). But they >seem fairly low-level, so I thought I'd let you know. Both of these look like they are not platform specific problems, so I am forwarding this EMail to the Tidy mailing list for comment. I am also assuming you are using the latest version of BBTidy based on the current 30 Apr 00 version of "tidy". > First, if one uses a repeated background as an image. The BBedit plug-in >produces a line in the embedded CSS section: > > body { > background-url: url(Upgrades/Graphics/macface.gif); > } > >But the CSS spec says this should be: > > body { > background-image: url(Upgrades/Graphics/macface.gif) > } > >Netscape does not apply any background with the former, but does the correct >action with the latter. > > Second, nested lists seem to give me a problem. The BBedit plug-in >complains >about the following: > ><ul> ><li> >xxx</li> > ><li> >xxx</li> > ><li> >xxx</li> > ><li> >xxx</li> > ><ol> ><li> >xxx</li> > ><li> >xxx</li> ></ol> > ><li> >xxx</li> ></ul> > >What it says is "line 135 column 1 - Warning: missing <li>" where the <ol> is >nested in the <ul>. If I look at the output: > > <ul> > <li>xxx</li> > > <li>xxx</li> > > <li>xxx</li> > > <li>xxx</li> > > <li class="c12"> > <ol> > <li>xxx</li> > > <li>xxx</li> > </ol> > </li> > >where " li.c12 {list-style: none}" is defined in the CSS section. >However, if I >look in the list portion of the HTML 4.01 spec (which is the most recent spec >with explicit rules about "list"), it states nested lists are fine. > >Thanks for taking the time to read this, and keep up the good work! Thanks for your interest in BBTidy and Tidy. Regards, Terry Teague
Received on Saturday, 8 July 2000 02:37:05 UTC