- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:44:08 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
- cc: html-tidy@w3.org
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Jelks Cabaniss wrote: > > Dave Raggett wrote: > > > My apologies for not having made this behavior clear in the > > documentation. An <li> element without an enclosing list (ul or ol) > > element is an error and gets reported to the user. > > As it should. > > > Originally, it > > was corrected by wrapping a ul element around it, however this > > caused the page to look quite different from how it would have > > looked in Netscape prior to being tidied. By experiment I found that > > using the style property to negatively indent the bullet gave a good > > semblance of the original rendering. The style attribute will be > > ignored by old browsers. > > Tidy has been further expanded to "make it look good in Netscape 4.x"? ??? > Even > with the "hack it until it looks good" yardstick, it truncates the > beginning of > the list item[s] in IE4.x, IE5.x, and Opera 3.x (and presumably Mozilla, > though > I don't have a recent build). > > Could this not be made an option, as opposed to default behavior? I will explore some more to see if a compromise is possible. Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett tel/fax: +44 122 578 3011 (or 2521) +44 385 320 444 (mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2000 12:44:10 UTC