- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:47:14 -0600
- To: "J. David Bryan" <jdbryan@acm.org>
- Cc: HTML Tidy List <html-tidy@w3.org>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, J. David Bryan wrote: > This report is for the Tidy version of 13th January 2000. > > When Tidy is asked to supply a DOCTYPE (e.g., with the configuration option > "doctype: strict"), it will supply one for HTML 4.0, which is obsolete. > The error is in lexer.c, lines 51-67): > > struct _vers > { > char *name; > char *voyager_name; > char *profile; > int code; > } W3C_Version[] = > { > {"HTML 2.0", "XHTML 1.0 Strict", voyager_strict, VERS_HTML20}, > {"HTML 3.2", "XHTML 1.0 Transitional", voyager_loose, VERS_HTML32}, > {"HTML 4.0", "XHTML 1.0 Strict", voyager_strict, VERS_HTML40_STRICT}, > {"HTML 4.0 Transitional", "XHTML 1.0 Transitional", voyager_loose, VERS_HTML40_LOOSE}, > {"HTML 4.0 Frameset", "XHTML 1.0 Frameset", voyager_frameset, VERS_FRAMES}, > {"HTML 4.01", "XHTML 1.0 Strict", voyager_strict, VERS_HTML40_STRICT}, > {"HTML 4.01 Transitional", "XHTML 1.0 Transitional", voyager_loose, VERS_HTML40_LOOSE}, > {"HTML 4.01 Frameset", "XHTML 1.0 Frameset", voyager_frameset, VERS_FRAMES} > }; > > Because the HTML 4.0 and 4.01 DOCTYPE strings carry the same internal > version flags (e.g., VERS_HTML40_STRICT), Tidy uses the first string > encountered with the desired version flag when generating the requested > DOCTYPE. As the HTML 4.0 strings are first, they are used in preference to > the 4.01 strings. Placing the 4.01 strings ahead of the 4.0 strings solves > the problem. Thanks for spotting this. I will reverse the order of the entries in this table to correct this. I plan to make a new release within the next 2 weeks. Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett tel/fax: +44 122 578 3011 (or 2521) +44 385 320 444 (mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 13:13:06 UTC