- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:49:08 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
- To: Barney Wol <Barney.Wol@noctua.demon.co.uk>
- cc: html-tidy@w3.org
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Barney Wol wrote: > The Macintosh version of the 13th Jan release produces a pretty > similar output, although as I have the "output-xml" option in config > set to "no", it gives an HTML 2.0 Doctype, and creates the Style > entry in the header. One does wonder where the "-2em" comes from, > but while this is a good party trick, should we really worry if such > a non-sensical input gives a rubbish output? After all, what is the > excuse always trotted out for computers - "Garbage in - garbage out!" > > Incidentally, Netscape 4.7 on the Mac displays your example below > "sensibly", in that the bullet is pretty hard against the left > margin, but it doesn't lose the first word, or anything for that > matter. My apologies for not having made this behavior clear in the documentation. An <li> element without an enclosing list (ul or ol) element is an error and gets reported to the user. Originally, it was corrected by wrapping a ul element around it, however this caused the page to look quite different from how it would have looked in Netscape prior to being tidied. By experiment I found that using the style property to negatively indent the bullet gave a good semblance of the original rendering. The style attribute will be ignored by old browsers. Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett tel/fax: +44 122 578 3011 (or 2521) +44 385 320 444 (mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2000 08:49:14 UTC