- From: Pete Gelbman <pete@arraycomm.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 23:04:33 +0800
- To: Fabrizio Pollastri <fabrizio@cstv.to.cnr.it>, richard.allsebrook@easysoft.com
- cc: html-tidy@w3.org
- Message-Id: <200006091504.XAA05955@isaiah.arraycomm.com>
Hi, I use the attached Perl script to post-process Tidy's output to do exactly what you guys want. It also does some other handy things. It's a filtering wrapper that runs Tidy on your input, then fine-tunes/strips things from it's output depending on which options you specify. Run it from the command line; it's usage basically mimics Tidy's. By default, unless you specify options it simply returns Tidy's output the same as if you ran Tidy directly. I run it with -s option to cleanup HTML fragments that get put into my server-side apps. Comments within the script should explain it pretty clearly; if not feel free to contact me. Note: I use it under Linux/Unix and I have no clue if it works on anything else. >>>>> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, "Fabrizio" == Fabrizio Pollastri wrote: Fabrizio> Hi all. Fabrizio> I would like to use tidy to clean my html, but I have my source Fabrizio> html split in fragments without the <body> </body> tags. Each Fabrizio> fragment is syntactically consistent. This is because I use wml to Fabrizio> generate my final html pages. Fabrizio> It is possible to use tidy in this case? In which way? Fabrizio> If not, it will be fine to add the option to ignore the missing Fabrizio> html stuff outside <body> </body> tags inclusive. Fabrizio> Thank in advance for any help. Fabrizio> Fabrizio Pollastri.
~pete
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: stidy
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 11:10:19 UTC