- From: Stuart Updegrave <supde@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 08:48:26 -0800
- To: "'Peter Kaiser'" <kaiser@acm.org>, html-tidy@w3.org
What you're running into is that BLOCKQUOTE is a block element, while TT is an inline element. Inline elements can't contain block elements according to my understanding of the formal HTML 4.0 spec. cheers, ~stuart -----Original Message----- From: Peter Kaiser [mailto:kaiser@acm.org] Sent: Saturday, December 04, 1999 2:13 AM To: html-tidy@w3.org Cc: kaiser@acm.org Subject: tidy vs block structure I'm puzzled at tidy's behavior on some HTML, of which this is typical, where my intent is for "<tt>" to apply to all the text inside the outer block, including within the inner block: <blockquote><tt>Indented one level. <blockquote>Indented two levels.</blockquote> Second 1-level indent.</tt></blockquote> To my naive eye, this looks okay, but tidy (30.11.99) declares Warning: missing </tt> before <blockquote> Warning: inserting implicit <tt> Warning: inserting implicit <tt> and changes it to <blockquote><tt>Indented one level.</tt> <blockquote><tt>Indented two levels.</tt></blockquote> <tt>Second 1-level indent.</tt></blockquote> Tidy complains similarly about <pre> ... <Hn> ... </Hn> ... <pre>, saying that <pre> must be closed before <Hn> and reopened after it. Do those two kinds of nesting violate the current standard? (If they do, then my emotional response is "then what's the purpose of nested structures at all?") ___Pete
Received on Monday, 6 December 1999 11:49:37 UTC